<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sign waiver denied</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walkeastwood.org/sign-waiver-denied/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walkeastwood.org/sign-waiver-denied/</link>
	<description>Sustainable living in &#34;The Village Within The City&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://walkeastwood.org/sign-waiver-denied/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 21:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkeastwood.org/?p=1456#comment-915</guid>
		<description>Set your sights only on the big fish and next thing you know the little fish you bypassed have gone on to feed a whale of a problem.  Let enough things like this sign slip through the cracks and there is little hope of achieving an Eastwood of old.

Also, there is no reason to believe that both large and small problems can not be worked on simultaneously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set your sights only on the big fish and next thing you know the little fish you bypassed have gone on to feed a whale of a problem.  Let enough things like this sign slip through the cracks and there is little hope of achieving an Eastwood of old.</p>
<p>Also, there is no reason to believe that both large and small problems can not be worked on simultaneously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonnie</title>
		<link>http://walkeastwood.org/sign-waiver-denied/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkeastwood.org/?p=1456#comment-911</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s as much a matter of case law as the aesthetics of one sign. Once you allow a waiver for this sign, you open the doors to overlarge, extremely bright, distracting LED signs all up and down James Street. The planning commission got it right. There have been slow but steady improvements along James Street, all following the design guidelines without waivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s as much a matter of case law as the aesthetics of one sign. Once you allow a waiver for this sign, you open the doors to overlarge, extremely bright, distracting LED signs all up and down James Street. The planning commission got it right. There have been slow but steady improvements along James Street, all following the design guidelines without waivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sposato</title>
		<link>http://walkeastwood.org/sign-waiver-denied/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sposato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkeastwood.org/?p=1456#comment-908</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t think the sign is a bad idea.  I don&#039;t think it would cause a problem.  We have bigger fish to fry around here.
Looking at the old pictures make me long for the old days when Eastwood was really nice.  Much of it needs improvement.  The sign is the least of our worries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t think the sign is a bad idea.  I don&#8217;t think it would cause a problem.  We have bigger fish to fry around here.<br />
Looking at the old pictures make me long for the old days when Eastwood was really nice.  Much of it needs improvement.  The sign is the least of our worries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.275 seconds -->

