<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Planning commission, June 8, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walkeastwood.org/public-notices/planning-commission-meetings/planning-commission-june-8-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walkeastwood.org</link>
	<description>Sustainable living in &#34;The Village Within The City&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 11:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonnie</title>
		<link>http://walkeastwood.org/public-notices/planning-commission-meetings/planning-commission-june-8-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkeastwood.org/?page_id=1201#comment-851</guid>
		<description>Stalling tactics are still in effect. While the PC voted &quot;no&quot; on the current ground sign design and &quot;yes&quot; on the overlarge 2nd story sign (now we can look forward to seeing that all up and down James St.), they left the door open: After most people concerned with this issue had left, thinking the PC had moved on to other items on the agenda, they allowed HDL to return with YET ANOTHER DESIGN. When will they have the courage to JUST SAY NO? This is a stalling tactic and Eastwood is being treated to it again. The HDL attorney said they&#039;d be back in two days with another design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stalling tactics are still in effect. While the PC voted &#8220;no&#8221; on the current ground sign design and &#8220;yes&#8221; on the overlarge 2nd story sign (now we can look forward to seeing that all up and down James St.), they left the door open: After most people concerned with this issue had left, thinking the PC had moved on to other items on the agenda, they allowed HDL to return with YET ANOTHER DESIGN. When will they have the courage to JUST SAY NO? This is a stalling tactic and Eastwood is being treated to it again. The HDL attorney said they&#8217;d be back in two days with another design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://walkeastwood.org/public-notices/planning-commission-meetings/planning-commission-june-8-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkeastwood.org/?page_id=1201#comment-850</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t the Walgreens sign variance supposed to be decided at this meeting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t the Walgreens sign variance supposed to be decided at this meeting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walkable Eastwood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Proposed POMCO signs and parking lot</title>
		<link>http://walkeastwood.org/public-notices/planning-commission-meetings/planning-commission-june-8-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Walkable Eastwood &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Proposed POMCO signs and parking lot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walkeastwood.org/?page_id=1201#comment-847</guid>
		<description>[...] you may know, the Planning Commission is holding a public hearing at their June 8 meeting about a new POMCO development.  It includes a resubdivision, a project site review, and sign [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you may know, the Planning Commission is holding a public hearing at their June 8 meeting about a new POMCO development.  It includes a resubdivision, a project site review, and sign [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.276 seconds -->

